Monday, February 11, 2008

Um...In Your Face?

I'm immensely happy that a jazz artist FINALLY won a Grammy for Album of the Year. It's especially gratifying that Winehouse didn't get this one because a) she's good, but overrated, b) soul is just a more pop-friendly Black art form, no matter how good you are, c) she beat out FOUR women of color (okay two had already won in previous years, so maybe this isn't racism). But let's not call her the "Queen of Soul" okay? Most people that own her album don't even own any other soul records, let alone New Soul Records, like Me'Shell or Jil Scott, etc.--they just like the whole "badass girls who can sing" thing. True, a small percentage of her fans will indeed subsequently purchase Stevie Wonder's Inner Visions or perhaps the Best of Aretha.

Unfortunately, Herbie Hancock is a "crossover" jazz artist, and The Joni Letters songs are very palatable: smooth and short (radio-friendly), with lots of guest artists (sort of like how Santana made a comeback). The only other time a jazz album won this award was in 1965 for the Getz/Gilberto collaboration ("The Girl from Ipanema"--you know this one), and even THAT was another palatable, bourgeois record. When, oh when, will BE-BOP jazz actually win? I guess never, since, pure musicality, especially the "I can't understand it--meh!00it make my brain hurt--meeeh!--I can't dance/fuck to it--meh!" kind of musicality never wins (see: every classical music record every made).

So, I wanted to say, "In Your Face!" to everyone who voted for the hipness and the cool-factor over, you know, musical ability or something, but Winehouse's record is just better--because Hancock's is ust not that great of a record, folks. If you wants you some Herbie Hancock, buy Maiden Voyage--anything with his post-Miles Davis group. Just not this. And certainly not the "Rockit" album or that horrible "Cantaloupe Island" song!

Urgh. It's fucking cold out. Urghhh.

4 comments:

queercat said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
queercat said...

Here's what the Times had to say:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/12/arts/music/12gramm.html

B said...

Ha!

I can't believe it said the exact things I said, too! Even "Maiden Voyage." Guess I was wrong about Getz/Gilberto: 1964, not '65.

The Times is right: it's a singer-songwriter album of "good taste." I'm in the camp of "jazz is dirty." I also don't like people's personalities (i.e.singer, bandleaders) as up front as I do with folk and pop. Jazz isn't about people, it's about concepts. And yet even as I write this, a voice in my ear reminds me that "solos" are precisely when the individual steps away from the group, makes a statement, and then steps back in.

There aren't many solos on his album because the each song is a solo, not a "jam." THe Times rightly points out that the Grammies have always favored that kind of music.

B said...

Oh yeah, one other thing: I like Joni Mitchell and think her music counts as "dirty" (meaning raw, often unpalatable to public taste), just not in Hancock's hands.